[Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#849727: Adopting seahorse-nautilus?

[u]

Hi Carlos,

any news about this?

Cheers!
u.

intrigeri:
> Hi,
> 
> (Carlos, are you subscribed to the list? If so I'll stop Cc'ing you.
> If not, well, you should :)
> 
> u:
>> I've created the corresponding Git repository and Carlos has imported
>> his changes in there. I've reviewed the packaging and Carlos did a lot
>> of great work there. I can confirm that everything builds fine.
> 
> Great :)
> 
>> There are some new patches for which I have not enough technical
>> expertise in order to evaluate them, so this should be done by somebody
>> else.
> 
> I can do that once their Origin field documents where they come from,
> and they are all forwarded upstream (or documented why it's not
> relevant for upstream).
> 
>> In the patches, I think we could have some more specific information
>> about what "more recent versions" is supposed to mean:
> 
>> In debian/patches/update-Makefile-am.patch
>> " This allows the Makefile.am files to work with more recent versions of
>>   automake without warnings."
> 
> Yes, please.
> 
>> There is a false positive in older versions of lintian reporting "E
>> missing-build-dependency-for-dh_-command":
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835449
> 
>> And here are some other errors I get, but I'm unsure if this is because
>> I use Jessie's lintian.
> 
> (Hint: a newer one is in jessie-backports, and quite often the version
> from testing/sid works just fine on stable.)
> 
>> $ lintian --pedantic seahorse-nautilus_3.11.92-2_amd64.changes
>> E: seahorse-nautilus-dbgsym: extended-description-is-empty
>> W: seahorse-nautilus-dbgsym: debug-package-should-be-named-dbg
>> usr/lib/debug/.build-id/
> 
> I confirm those are issues with the old Lintian, can't reproduce on sid.
> 
>> Could you take this over from here, intrigeri?
> 
> Sure. I've sent this back to Carlos' plate (see above
> comments) though.
> 
> Cheers!
>