[Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Proposal: membership and decision-making process

[Antoine Beaupré]

On 2018-07-26 11:49:11, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> thanks for all the clarifications, Ulrike!
>
> I've pushed a dkg/policy-amendment branch to the git repo
> (https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-privacy-team/team-processes) that i think
> reflects those changes.
>
> I'm attaching a collapsed changeset that shows the differences between
> the two versions.  the git history itself breaks the changes down into
> sensible bite-size pieces.
>
> i hope this is useful!
>
>   --dkg
>
> ps another detail concern pops up: if you decide to adopt these changes,
>    does that reset the clock on the decision-making process?  that's not
>    clear here.

Maybe we could explicitely clarify this, but I would assume it does
reset the clock.

Review of diff below, thanks for attaching here! :)

> diff --git a/pkg-privacy-process.mdwn b/pkg-privacy-process.mdwn
> index 13bc878..d9b644a 100644
> --- a/pkg-privacy-process.mdwn
> +++ b/pkg-privacy-process.mdwn
> @@ -7,6 +7,12 @@
>    (b) team member: individual member of the team
>    (c) team administrator: team member with additional administrative
>        rights on the team's infrastructure
> +  (d) mailing list: the mailing list used by the Debian Privacy Tools
> +      Maintainers, currently
> +      pkg-privacy-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
> +  (e) GitLab group: the public collection of git repositories and other
> +      metadata jointly controlled by the group, currently
> +      https://salsa.debian.org/groups/pkg-privacy-team

I wonder if we could use something else than "GitLab group" for
future-proofing. In my documentation, I use "project page" for such a
link.

Not a blocker of course, but if we're going to make definitions, we
could keep the wording more abstract...

Everything else looks fine to me.

A.
-- 
Travail, du latin Tri Palium trois pieux, instrument de torture.