[Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Proposal: membership and decision-making process

Antoine Beaupré anarcat at debian.org
Thu Jul 26 17:13:11 BST 2018

On 2018-07-26 11:49:11, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> thanks for all the clarifications, Ulrike!
> I've pushed a dkg/policy-amendment branch to the git repo
> (https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-privacy-team/team-processes) that i think
> reflects those changes.
> I'm attaching a collapsed changeset that shows the differences between
> the two versions.  the git history itself breaks the changes down into
> sensible bite-size pieces.
> i hope this is useful!
>   --dkg
> ps another detail concern pops up: if you decide to adopt these changes,
>    does that reset the clock on the decision-making process?  that's not
>    clear here.

Maybe we could explicitely clarify this, but I would assume it does
reset the clock.

Review of diff below, thanks for attaching here! :)

> diff --git a/pkg-privacy-process.mdwn b/pkg-privacy-process.mdwn
> index 13bc878..d9b644a 100644
> --- a/pkg-privacy-process.mdwn
> +++ b/pkg-privacy-process.mdwn
> @@ -7,6 +7,12 @@
>    (b) team member: individual member of the team
>    (c) team administrator: team member with additional administrative
>        rights on the team's infrastructure
> +  (d) mailing list: the mailing list used by the Debian Privacy Tools
> +      Maintainers, currently
> +      pkg-privacy-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
> +  (e) GitLab group: the public collection of git repositories and other
> +      metadata jointly controlled by the group, currently
> +      https://salsa.debian.org/groups/pkg-privacy-team

I wonder if we could use something else than "GitLab group" for
future-proofing. In my documentation, I use "project page" for such a

Not a blocker of course, but if we're going to make definitions, we
could keep the wording more abstract...

Everything else looks fine to me.

Travail, du latin Tri Palium trois pieux, instrument de torture.

More information about the Pkg-privacy-maintainers mailing list