Who's next proftpd module?

[Fabrizio Regalli]

Hello again,

Il giorno gio, 17/03/2011 alle 20.37 +0100, Fabrizio Regalli ha scritto:
> Hello
> 
> Il giorno gio, 17/03/2011 alle 19.59 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine ha
> scritto:
> > 
> > At least a couple of other modules have been asked in the past,
> > they are reported on BTS. But for that, it is a good idea moving
> > the experimental mod_vroot out of the core (with a proper management
> > of upgrading to the separated package). TJ confirmed that it will
> > not be distributed in 1.3.4 because it is still too experimental (and
> > in someway incomplete).
> > 
> 
> Ok, I'm taking mod_vroot.
> Thanks.

just a question: the source package of mod_vroot contains a directory
called "t" (does it mean "test?) Into there are some perl scripts.
How about these scripts? Should be included in the package?
If yes, in which directory?

Thanks.
Cheers,

Fabrizio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-proftpd-maintainers/attachments/20110317/31e8b422/attachment.pgp>