Bug#740177: Prospective proftpd should replace inetd/xinetd with socket systemd

[Hilmar Preusse]

forwarded 740177 http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3661
stop

On 26.02.14 Francesco Paolo Lovergine (frankie at debian.org) wrote:

Hi,

> This is just for a future possible enahancement. In the meantime the
> inetd/xinetd use should be deprecated and avoided in order to not having
> problems such as those pointed on RH bugzilla
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708997)
> 
> Unfortunately, the socket implementation has issues at upstream level:
> http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3661
> It does not seem that it will be managed any time soon.
> 
According to this bug report the requested feature seems to be in
1.3.6rc2. Marking that bug a forwarded for now.

Hilmar
-- 
sigfault
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-proftpd-maintainers/attachments/20161214/adabda32/attachment.sig>