Questions about proftp modules
Hilmar Preuße
hille42 at web.de
Sat Feb 24 13:18:56 GMT 2018
On 11.02.2018 18:37, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:26:52PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi Francesco,
>> two short questions regarding modules.
>>
>> 1. in 1.3.6 we enable a few new modules. Do we have to enter these new
>> modules in debian/templates/modules.conf ?
>>
>
> Yes, eventually commented for non-core modules or optional ones.
>
OK, I've done that.
>> 2. in debian/rules we build module mod_readme into the proftpd
>> binary instead of a DSO. Is there a specific reason to do this
>> instead of loading the code optional?
>
> If I'm rembering correctly the mod_readme cannot be loaded as DSO (at
> least last time I checked).
>
Did test it again, it worked for me. The module worked as announced and
I had to load it using a LoadModule statement, else the DisplayReadme
statement resulted in a startup failure of the proftpd service.
So, I'll change that and make loading the module optional, but leave it
commented in to avoid failures of proftpd startups upon upgrade.
H.
--
#206401 http://counter.li.org
More information about the Pkg-proftpd-maintainers
mailing list