Should we ship a pulseaudio-doc package?
luke.yelavich at canonical.com
Fri May 6 22:15:48 UTC 2016
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 10:17:15PM AEST, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 5 May 2016 at 22:26, Luke Yelavich <luke.yelavich at canonical.com> wrote:
> > Hey folks.
> > I'm working on another project that uses pulseaudio right now, and I
> > found myself needing to look at the pulseaudio API documentation. When
> > this happens, I tend to head straight for the doc package of the relevant
> > project I want to work with, rather than jumping on the net, since I am
> > generally more concerned with using the API that is in my distro at the time.
> > I discovered we don't have a pulseaudio documentation package. I am of
> > the opinion that we should ship the docs, and it looks simple enough,
> > build-dep on doxygen, and run make doxygen during package build.
> > Thoughts?
> Makes sense, but I would name it libpulse-doc, as it is the API docs,
> and not documentation for the program.
Sure. I had thought of that afterwards.
Ok will get that in git when I get a chance.
More information about the pkg-pulseaudio-devel