[Pkg-puppet-devel] Are we ok with the state of 0.25.0 ?

[Micah Anderson]

* Nigel Kersten <nigel at explanatorygap.net> [2009-10-14 08:39-0400]:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Micah Anderson <micah at riseup.net> wrote:
> 
> > * Andrew Pollock <apollock at debian.org> [2009-09-26 17:55-0400]:
> > > On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:48:21AM -0400, Micah Anderson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm really glad this got sorted out, I haven't tried to go through the
> > > > same steps you have yet, so my brain isn't fully wrapped around how
> > this
> > > > works, or why. I'm afraid that when I do need to do this, I will have
> > to
> > > > dig through the mailing list archives and try to reconstruct the steps
> > > > based on what folks reported here... it might be better if we
> > maintained
> > > > a page to preserve these details, maybe on wiki.debian.org?
> > >
> > > Yes, we should definitely maintain some documentation, either on the Wiki
> > or
> > > on the Alioth project page.
> >
> > This was a minor digression into the need for documentation of the git
> > procedures of the package, I'm sorry if it distracted from the main
> > point, which was getting 0.25 uploaded.
> >
> > What, if anything, are we waiting on at this point?
> >
> 
> 0.25.1, which will be very very soon, within days.

Sounds reasonable.

> There was a potential data corruption bug that I was very concerned about in
> 0.25.0, but it's looking like that's actually doing more correct erb
> template evaluation than 0.24.x was.

Do you have a reference to this? if its not an actual bug, I'm going to
want to check my templates before I corrupt things :) In fact, it might
be worth adding to NEWS?

Micah
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-puppet-devel/attachments/20091014/9f3f61ae/attachment.pgp>