[Pkg-puppet-devel] puppet_0.25.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Stig Sandbeck Mathisen]

Barry deFreese <ftpmaster at debian.org> writes:

> Hello maintainer,

Hello, and thanks for reviewing the latest uppload of puppet.

> I am rejecting puppet.

Oh, dear...

> conf/osx/createpackage.sh is (C) 2008 Google Inc. and carries an
> Apache 2.0 license.

Ok, I've added this to debian/copyright.

> examples/modules/sample-module/lib/puppet/parser/functions/hostname_to_dn.rb
> is (C) David Schmitt and seems to carry an MIT/BSD style license.

It is the 3-clause BSD license.  Added to debian/copyright

> Other minor issues:
>
> conf/gentoo/init.d/puppet* are (C) 1999-2004 Gentoo Foundation and is
> GPLv2.  Should probably be noted in debian/copyright.

Added to debian/copyright

> You should version your path to the common-license to
> /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2.

Updated.

> There may be other issues, I stopped checking here.

I found 14 cases where copyright or license did not match "Reductive
Labs, LLC / GPL-2+", and added those to debian/copyright. 

> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.

There are 105 files where there is no license, the copyright mentions a
year, and the creator in the header is a person from reductive labs.
Can I assume these are covered by the general copyright and license
statement from Reductive Labs?

Could I please ask you to look at:

<http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-puppet/puppet.git;a=blob;f=debian/copyright;h=5418f6c441aa2c1d4a40279ab86c9c9212286681;hb=63ff54e65aed2630090c9c8423cf14ae7e140c06>

and see if this is sufficient for a debian/copyright file?

Thanks,
-- 
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
                      ooo, shiny!