[Pkg-puppet-devel] Fwd: Ruby load path and vendor_ruby

Nigel Kersten nigel at explanatorygap.net
Thu Jan 21 23:55:43 UTC 2010


On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Nigel Kersten
<nigel at explanatorygap.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 6:28 PM, micah anderson <micah at riseup.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:14:05 -0800, Nigel Kersten <nigel at explanatorygap.net> wrote:
>>> so if I'm reading this correctly, we should revert the vendor_ruby
>>> change for facter as it's targeted for post-squeeze?
>>
>> Sounds good to me. I was the one who introduced that change, and was
>> advocating for it, so I figured I should pipe up and say so.
>
> Heh. I should probably also pipe up and say that I think the whole
> vendor_ruby thing is a good idea even if we're not ready for it yet :)

So I started looking at the facter package again today for the first
time in way too long.

Given we're going to be reverting the vendor_ruby situation, should we
continue to use the work Micah did with ruby-pkg-tools:

include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
include /usr/share/ruby-pkg-tools/1/class/ruby-setup-rb.mk
DEB_RUBY_CONFIG_ARGS = --prefix=/usr
--siteruby=/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby
--siterubyver=/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby --shebang=neve

or should we move to the same system as we have for puppet where we
use the upstream install.rb script?



More information about the Pkg-puppet-devel mailing list