[Pkg-puppet-devel] Plans for Squeeze?
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
ssm at debian.org
Mon Oct 4 20:19:01 UTC 2010
Nigel Kersten <nigel at explanatorygap.net> writes:
> I think that gets the point across perfectly.
Thanks.
> I'm a little concerned we'll be in the same spot with 2.6.2... but
> we're trying to iterate faster upstream, so hopefully we can cherry
> pick without too much hassle.
I've got another problem, though.
The 2.6.1 tarball we relased for experimental contained a few artifacts
from a not-quite-perfect merge.
The 2.6.1 tarball in the squeeze-2.6.1 branch has those artifacts
removed.
There is one duplicate target In the Rakefile, three files inside
spec/ which were duplicated instead of renamed, and a number of
"reductivelabs" <-> "puppetlabs" or "Puppet Labs" <-> "Reductive Labs"
string changes in LICENSE or comments.
I guess these differences originate from one of my first merges. At
least the string changes looks like something I struggled with during my
first merge.
(Nothing major, but still. I don't like to ship different "upstream"
tarballs than upstream actually does)
Would uploading 2.6.2rcwhatever to experimental ensure we can upload a
proper 2.6.1 orig.tar.gz later?
--
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
ooo, shiny!
More information about the Pkg-puppet-devel
mailing list