Requesting squeeze-backport of python-debian

[Bernd Zeimetz]

On 12/26/2011 02:32 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:26:34PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> sure: me. Backports is not a path for bugfixes, the should addressed
>> with stable updates.
> 
> Great! The issue is settled then.
> 
> Let's now all rejoice of the fact that we have been very effective at
> pissing off the only participant in the thread who was actually willing
> to *work* on the bug. For the next time, I humbly suggest an answer like
> « thanks for your interest in fixing this bug, however, please do so in
> stable for the benefit of even more Debian users ».

The only participant *asked* for a fix for #597249 and did not show any
interested in fixing that bug, all he seems to be interested in is #637524. He
got two technical correct and IMHO *not* unfriendly answers. Not to forget that
he - as a Debian developer - should know how backports work and what it is.

> Merry #637524.


-- 
 Bernd Zeimetz                            Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.de                                http://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F