On the license of python-debian for use as a library

Stefano Zacchiroli zack at upsilon.cc
Wed Aug 14 19:28:55 BST 2019


On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 07:19:39PM +0200, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> Note that I am not asking for a permissive license: I would be quite

Oh, sorry, that wasn't clear to me. I'd be fine in this case with a
scope-limited reciprocal license like indeed LGPL (2+ or 3+, depending
on what's needed in the rest of the code base).

> That's a fair point, but I was making a case not only for my code but
> other existing projects that use a permissive license and call
> python-debian code.

Well, nobody else asked, so let's deal with your specific need/request
for now.

Cheers
-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli . zack at upsilon.cc . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o
Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o
Former Debian Project Leader & OSI Board Director  . . . o o o . . . o .
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »



More information about the pkg-python-debian-maint mailing list