Release impact of introducing a new archive section?
dod at debian.org
Thu Dec 8 18:09:37 UTC 2016
On Thursday, 8 December 2016 18:17:23 CET gregor herrmann wrote:
> Ah, I see; that makes sense. So, perl6 X::Y::Z modules will use the
> > naming perl6-x-y-z?
> Yup, that's my understanding.
Yes, that's the plan.
> > In any case, I don't have any objections to a new section; I just wanted
> > to check about the alternative possibility of using "perl" (which in any
> > case seems better than using "interpreters").
> Ack. I just wanted to add my opinion that combining them with "perl"
> doesn't seem to be a good idea.
Perl5 and Perl6 are considered by upstream as 2 different languages (even if
of the same familly). That's why I think having 2 separate sections is
preferable to match upstream's point of view.
> And I'm not sure if we need perl6 _now_, given the amount of
Yes, this can wait until jessie is released. I just hope to find the time to
package Perl6 modules before Buster :-/
All the best
https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org
More information about the Pkg-rakudo-devel