[request-tracker-maintainers] rt-3.6.1 release and filing ITP

Tim Cutts timc at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri Sep 1 12:57:38 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 1 Sep 2006, at 10:31 am, Niko Tyni wrote:

> Hi,
>
> that's great news. The changes look OK to me. I made a few more, and
> finally found some time to test the package. Quick tests seems to work
> for me, including an upgrade from 3.4 to 3.6 with a test database.
>
> I'll file an ITP straight away; can't see any reason why not.
>
> I wonder if this should go into unstable or experimental first? There
> have been a few interested users who could test it from experimental,
> but I guess the audience is otherwise very limited... maybe straight
> to unstable is the way to go.

Either is fine by me.

> I suppose we'll have both 3.4 and 3.6 in etch, as it seems too late
> to drop 3.4. I think we should adopt 3.4 as well, it's still on the QA
> group's hands.

I think that's all wise.  I'm very much in favour of keeping both at  
the moment.  My experiences here with trying to upgrade a test 3.4  
instance 3.6 have not been very smooth, or successful.  I think we'd  
be inviting a world of pain if we try to remove 3.4 in the near  
future.  Also given the sorts of environments in which people tend to  
use RT, they are likely to want parallel installations of both, and  
we should probably just provide a script to help people move data  
from one to the other when they're ready.

> Now we just have to find a DD to do the actual upload(s) :) I'm CCing
> Tim Cutts, who expressed interest earlier, as I'm not sure if he's on
> the pkg-request-tracker-maintainers list.

I'm not on the list yet, I don't think.

> Tim, would you have time to
> look into this? The packages are in the svn.debian.org repository:
>
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-request-tracker
>
> Of course, the DDs on the list are also welcome to do this :)

I'm a wee bit busy at the moment with work things that are not RT  
related, but I'll have a look as soon as I can find the time.  Can't  
really promise a timescale at the moment.

Tim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBRPguRhypeFo2odvPAQJGkAf/b73qWFQewp87q9gU28zJ9jDPwuf3kpjZ
GQA05ikMJmVWFG+Zq39lEBNYNUHgXIzdovnMg4vju34vOz6+DTxz/wpvkaxhN7ZF
VVlwEY/c9noJ6uEv3ZOp3xIAaoEw4y7wW3GsozFAxxRSVutbkXk0tQbMO5BpAtjw
DH4XVQA6Yhul1CeSOnKI8eFYAdnV1JitFbGM6YjFCA96/1gi5baaWGx0kihhNSea
jGlw0boBx/YGvLtBFpa69qif2lR3Se1TYzFDPxp7hUhA7nrRisKwLz6RiL7LdTcM
wAq68OO9BlXypI2iLfmOzNQWCstY1r6lhsXBSG6blu4QyQfxPmb//Q==
=KbWF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the pkg-request-tracker-maintainers mailing list