[request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#336581: [rt-bugs at bestpractical.com: [fsck.com #14498] Unknown RT::Condition::UntouchedInHours example in rt-crontool manpage]

[Dominic Hargreaves]

tags 336581 +fixed-upstream
thanks

----- Forwarded message from sunnavy via RT <rt-bugs at bestpractical.com> -----

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
Subject: [fsck.com #14498] Unknown RT::Condition::UntouchedInHours example in
	rt-crontool manpage 
From: sunnavy via RT <rt-bugs at bestpractical.com>
Reply-To: rt-bugs at bestpractical.com
To: dom at earth.li
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 05:09:53 -0400
X-Urchin-Spam-Score-Int: -59
X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.7

fixed in e58e7c98:
replaced RT::Condition::UntouchedInHour with a real module: RT::Condition::Overdue

thanks for reporting this.

best wishes
sunnavy
On Sun Mar 07 18:32:57 2010, dom at earth.li wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As reported at
> 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=336581
> 
> a very long time ago indeed, the manpage to rt-crontool contains a
> reference to a perl module which does not exist in the core distribution,
> 
> RT::Condition::UntouchedInHours
> 
> I daresay that this has been a small source of confusion over the years,
> as people try and use that example.
> 
> Perhaps the manpage could be updated to clarify that UntouchedInHours
> is a hypothetical condition, or even better, replace the example with
> one that is usable out of the box.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dominic.
> 



----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)