[request-tracker-maintainers] 4.2?

[Kai Storbeck]

On 02/01/14 21:08, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 10:12:26AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 04:58:06PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>>> * Giving the users the choice of 4.0 or 4.2 whilst both are maintained
>>>   upstream. This would mean that RT 4.2 could hit unstable sooner.
>>
>> We don't want to release with both, do we?
> 
> No, but we might want users to have the option of 4.0 backports for
> a while longer. But maybe I'm just trying to keep everyone happy and
> doomed to failure :)

From a sysadmins perspective I am interested in a stable package that
gets security updates, and no big new features (like changing themes). I
don't care wether that comes from backports or from a debian release.

Having a 4.0 backports option would block any 4.2 backports version,
wouldn't it?

Although I don't consider 4.2 that much of an upgrade, and my preference
does go out to a single package.

Regards,
Kai

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 884 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-request-tracker-maintainers/attachments/20140103/9556f513/attachment.sig>