[request-tracker-maintainers] RFS: libmodule-install-rtx-perl

Dominic Hargreaves dom at earth.li
Fri Dec 16 17:47:38 UTC 2016


On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 08:04:05PM +0900, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote:
> hi,
> 
> Thank you for reviewing;
> 
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Dominic Hargreaves <dom at earth.li> wrote:
> > so this isn't quite right yet.
> >
> > I noticed you didn't follow my suggestion to merge the changes from the
> > upstream tarball into the dpkg branch. AFAICT this is the only sane
> > way to fix this kind of problem when trying commits from the upstream
> > repository.
> 
> So, we should have 'upstream' branch which we import upstream tarballs,
> leaving upstream's 'master' branch, right?
> # after all it is meaningless to have packaging stuff inside upstream
> repo... :-(

Yes, exactly.

> Anyway, I understand that my try to fill the gap between repos and
> tarballs had failed.
> 
> > Could you have a look a the upstream and dom/dpkg branches I've pushed to
> > see what I mean and whether you agree, and let me know whether you're
> > happy for me to upload or whether you think we should be doing
> > it differently?
> 
> No problem, please go the way above, thanks.
> And I will follow with other rtx- packages soon.

Thanks, will do. There are probably more optimised routes to including
upstream commits in the debian packaging branch, but I'm not too
familiar with those.

Cheers,
Dominic.



More information about the pkg-request-tracker-maintainers mailing list