[Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers] Re: [Pkg-ruby-extras-commits] r1215 - in packages: . tioga tioga/branches tioga/branches/upstream

[Vincent Fourmond]

Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 02:25:22PM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
>> Author: fourmond-guest
>> Date: 2006-12-16 14:25:22 +0100 (Sat, 16 Dec 2006)
>> New Revision: 1215
>>
>> Added:
>>    packages/tioga/
> 
> Please, try to map the source (package) names to the module that is
> required to use this library.  This is the current convention (and I
> know it should be formalised better soon).

  OK. I'll know for next time, but this package has been in Debian for a
while, and I don't think it is a good idea to change the source package
name now that it is in the archive (correct me if I'm wrong).

  I have another package (source name qt4-qtruby, already in the
archive) to integrate to the SVN repository. Should I change the source
package name ?

  And what should we do in case there are mostly programs in the package
? (but in Ruby)

> So "require 'foo'" -> libfoo-ruby
> and "require 'foo/bar/baz'" -> libfoo-bar-baz-ruby.

  This should definitely be mentioned on the 'Ruby Policy' draft found
on the website.

  Cheers,

	Vincent

-- 
Vincent Fourmond, PhD student
http://vincent.fourmond.neuf.fr/