[Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers] Package "ownership"

[Paul van Tilburg]

On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 11:42:36PM +0000, Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote:
>     I'm going to take "ownership" for libcommandline-ruby and libjson-ruby,
> the packages I uploaded.

Ok, that leaves a few packages not updated:
libcmdparse2-ruby       -> Arnaud/
libgpgme-ruby           -> Thierry?
liblocale-ruby          -> Terceiro?
liblog4r-ruby           -> ??

Who wants to take the last one?

>     1) The changelog ends with the 0.7.10-5 revision.... but it says
> "unstable", not "UNRELEASED". The last uploaded version seems to be 0.7.10-4
> according to http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libcommandline-ruby.html, so
> it seems that it's indeed unreleased. Shouldn't we always keep the
> "UNRELEASED" until just before tagging & uploading the package?



>     2) The above URL says that override and the deb have different opinions
> about the package sections. In this case I think that override is right, so I
> guess I should just change the package sections for the next upload. Anyone
> against this?

Not at all.  I talked about this on #debian-devel some time ago, because
the whole sectioning of Ruby stuff is quite wrong.  The interpreters
section should contain interpreters, so ruby, ruby1.8, ruby1.9.  Except
for feed2imap, which is a net(work), everything we have packaged are
libs or lib docs.  Who cares they are interpreted or not?

Paul

-- 
Student @ Eindhoven                         | email: paulvt at debian.org
University of Technology, The Netherlands   | JID: paul at luon.net
>>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20060325/a62b66a7/attachment-0001.pgp