[DRE-maint] Some of your Debian packages might need attention

[Lucas Nussbaum]

On 26/09/07 at 07:35 +0000, DDPOMail robot wrote:
> Dear Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers,
> 
> The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
> you maintain in Debian:
> 
> === libcairo-ruby: (you co-maintain this package)
> = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
>   to testing for 162 days.
>   See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=libcairo-ruby>
> 
> === libgpgme-ruby: (you co-maintain this package)
> = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
>   to testing for 99 days.
>   See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=libgpgme-ruby>
> 
> === libhpricot-ruby: (you co-maintain this package)
> = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
>   to testing for 70 days.
>   See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=libhpricot-ruby>
> 
> === libqt4-ruby: (you co-maintain this package)
> = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
>   to testing for 147 days.
>   See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=libqt4-ruby>
> 
> === ruby-gnome2: (you co-maintain this package)
> = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
>   to testing for 122 days.
>   See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=ruby-gnome2>
> 
> === ruby-gstreamer0.10: (you co-maintain this package)
> = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
>   to testing for 99 days.
>   See <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=ruby-gstreamer0.10>

All caused by ruby1.9 or xulrunner. Nothing we can do about that, except
that we should clarify whether we should use ruby1.9 as build-dep at all
with the interpreter maintainers...
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |