[DRE-maint] ruby-setup-rb.mk, and ftbses
Lucas Nussbaum
lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net
Sat Jan 12 22:51:54 UTC 2008
On 12/01/08 at 23:40 +0100, Arnaud Cornet wrote:
> > This doesn't work. The idea is to always use setup.rb from the package.
> > Using upstream's setup.rb will make us use old versions of setup.rb,
> > which won't support some of the options we use.
>
> That's not what is currently implemented at all then.
Yes, but that's what we kind-of decided after I tested all our packages
with the version of ruby-pkg-tools in the repository, I think...
> > > > The current in the archive still builds all our packages fine, so
> > > > there's no emergency.
> > >
> > > The emmergency is that I cannot upload my package as it build-depends on
> > > a ruby-pkg-tools >= 0.13 not in sid yet.
> > >
> > > Also, some packages in sid right now ftbs if rebuild.
> >
> > if rebuilt with the version of ruby-pkg-tools in sid?
> >
> > please give an example.
>
> webgen0.4, libdbus-ruby (in our svn) are those that I tested.
I did a rebuild of all packages in Debian yesterday, and both webgen0.4
and libdbus-ruby built fine in an up-to-date sid chroot.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
mailing list