[DRE-maint] ruby-setup-rb.mk, and ftbses

[Lucas Nussbaum]

On 12/01/08 at 21:14 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> Arnaud Cornet escreveu isso aí:
> > 
> > Le samedi 12 janvier 2008 à 23:51 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > > On 12/01/08 at 23:40 +0100, Arnaud Cornet wrote:
> > > > > This doesn't work. The idea is to always use setup.rb from the package.
> > > > > Using upstream's setup.rb will make us use old versions of setup.rb,
> > > > > which won't support some of the options we use.
> > > > 
> > > > That's not what is currently implemented at all then.
> > > 
> > > Yes, but that's what we kind-of decided after I tested all our packages
> > > with the version of ruby-pkg-tools in the repository, I think...
> > 
> > 
> > You and Paul seem to agree on that. I'm worried of bad behaved upstreams
> > that hack around setup.rb but hey you have do settle down on something.
> > 
> > I just commited in the ruby-setup-rb.mk class code  that enforces the
> > use of libsetup-ruby's setup.rb.
> 
> I think I have a simpler solution. What to you think about just:
> 
> --- 1/class/ruby-setup-rb.mk    (revisão 2419)
> +++ 1/class/ruby-setup-rb.mk    (cópia de trabalho)
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
>  include /usr/share/ruby-pkg-tools/1/class/ruby-common.mk
>  
>  PACKAGED_RUBY_SETUP_CMD = /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/setup.rb
> -DEB_RUBY_SETUP_CMD = setup.rb
> +DEB_RUBY_SETUP_CMD = debian-setup.rb
>  DEB_RUBY_CONFIG_ARGS = --installdirs=std
>  DEB_RUBY_CLEAN_TARGET = distclean
> 
> 
> This way we don't touch upstream's setup.rb and don't have to check anything
> else.
> 
> I still need to check if all the packages build with this change. BTW, what is
> the most practical way to do that?

When I did it back in december, I apt-get source'd all the packages in
the same dir, then run pbuilder with a chroot with ruby-pkg-tools
installed on each of them.
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |