[DRE-maint] pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@ -> debian-ruby@?

[Vincent Fourmond]

  Hello !

Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I think that we should switch to using only debian-ruby@ for everything
> except commit logs (which go to pkg-ruby-extras-commits@). This matches
> what the perl team does, and it seems to be totally bearable even for
> bigger teams.
> 
> What do you think?


  I don't like so much the idea. I can kinda follow debian-ruby. I just
accidentally read pkg-ruby-extra. I'm not interested in dak announcement
and bug reports of packages I don't maintain.

  What is done in debian-java is the following - just like what was done
more or less here so far:

  - general discussion on debian-java
  - package-specific stuff on pkg-java, unless it needs wider attention,
in which case debian-java is the place to go.

  This makes a clear distinction between both lists by potential
interest. I would sincerely wish to keep it like that. Maybe what is
missing is simply a clear statement in this way, on the pkg-ruby-extra
web page (or any other reference place), or maybe even on the
pkg-ruby-extra-maintainers at l.a.d.o footers.

  What do you think about that ?

  Of course, if the group prefer everything on debian-ruby, I'd give in
;-)...

  Cheers,

	Vincent


-- 
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/

find(1):
 A `%' at the end of the format argument causes undefined behaviour
 since there is no following character. In some locales, it may
 hide your door keys, while in others it may remove the final page
 from the novel you are reading.

Vincent, listening to Curly Headed Baby (Doc Watson)