[DRE-maint] Possible problems in your Debian packages
DDPOMail robot
geissert at debian.org
Fri Jul 10 21:03:30 UTC 2009
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail
=== libactivesupport-ruby: (you co-maintain it)
= No migration to testing for 256 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=libactivesupport-ruby>
= Lintian reports 1 error(s) and 3 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/acr-debian@athenacr.com.html#libactivesupport-ruby
=== libcairo-ruby: (you co-maintain it)
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #519755 <http://bugs.debian.org/519755>
libcairo-ruby1.8: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase
Appears to affect stable, you should fix it for the next point release
=== libflexmock-ruby: (you co-maintain it)
= Lintian reports 1 error(s) and 3 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/acr-debian@athenacr.com.html#libflexmock-ruby
=== libgsl-ruby: (you co-maintain it)
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #530117 <http://bugs.debian.org/530117>
libgsl-ruby-doc: bashism in /bin/sh script
Part of release goal: switch /bin/sh to dash
= Lintian reports 11 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/daigo@debian.org.html#libgsl-ruby
=== libhaml-ruby: (you co-maintain it)
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #536091 <http://bugs.debian.org/536091>
haml-elisp: byte-compilation fails
=== libheckle-ruby: (you co-maintain it)
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #533927 <http://bugs.debian.org/533927>
libheckle-ruby: FTBFS: tests failed
=== libhpricot-ruby: (you co-maintain it)
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #534721 <http://bugs.debian.org/534721>
libhpricot-ruby1.8: Hpricot's XML parser fails to parse simple, valid XML
=== libinline-ruby: (you co-maintain it)
= Lintian reports 1 error(s) and 4 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/patrick_@freenet.de.html#libinline-ruby
=== liblocale-ruby: (you co-maintain it)
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #515708 <http://bugs.debian.org/515708>
liblocale-ruby: package must be kept out of testing
= Not in testing for 142 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=liblocale-ruby>
= Lintian reports 7 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/terceiro@softwarelivre.org.html#liblocale-ruby
=== librmagick-ruby:
= No migration to testing for 75 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=librmagick-ruby>
=== libtzinfo-ruby: (you co-maintain it)
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #503591 <http://bugs.debian.org/503591>
Please don't include yet another copy of tzdata in the archive
= Not in testing for 257 days.
See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=libtzinfo-ruby>
= Lintian reports 1 error(s) and 6 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/acr-debian@athenacr.com.html#libtzinfo-ruby
=== libxslt-ruby: (you co-maintain it)
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #521991 <http://bugs.debian.org/521991>
libxslt-ruby: FTBFS: Linker error
Appears to affect stable, you should fix it for the next point release
= Lintian reports 7 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/filipe@icewall.org.html#libxslt-ruby
=== ruby-gnome2: (you co-maintain it)
= 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon:
- #519786 <http://bugs.debian.org/519786>
libglade2-ruby1.8: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase
= Lintian reports 2 warning(s), you should consider fixing them.
See http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/acornet@debian.org.html#ruby-gnome2
=== Packages with a new upstream version according to DEHS:
libflexmock-ruby 0.8.6 (Debian: 0.8.5-1)
libheckle-ruby 1.4.3 (Debian: 1.4.2-1)
libimage-science-ruby 1.2.0 (Debian: 1.1.3-1)
libinline-ruby 3.8.2 (Debian: 3.6.7-1)
libmocha-ruby 0.9.7 (Debian: 0.9.5-1)
libopenid-ruby 2.1.7 (Debian: 2.1.6debian-1)
libqt4-ruby 2.0.3 (Debian: 1.4.10-3)
librspec-ruby 1.2.7 (Debian: 1.2.6-1)
libsdl-ruby 2.0-alpha1 (Debian: 1.3.1-1)
libspreadsheet-ruby 0.6.4 (Debian: 0.6.3.1-1)
libtzinfo-ruby 0.3.13 (Debian: 0.3.12-1)
libwill-paginate-ruby /v2.3.11 (Debian: 2.3.7-1)
------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------
We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.
If you don't want to receive this type of mail any more, you can reply
to this mail and use one of the following commands at the beginning of
the mail:
- unsubscribe <email>
You will no longer receive any mail for any package. If you received
this email because you are subscribed to packages on the PTS, this
won't remove your PTS subscription.
- ignore <package> <email>
You will no longer receive information about that package in those
mails. So if that package is the only one with problems, you won't
receive anything.
- ignore <bug> <email>
You will no longer receive information about this bug.
All commands are manually processed, but you will receive
confirmation. The commands are just here so that we know precisely
what you want.
A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
See:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have questions or if you
believe it can be improved. The wiki page will be updated with useful
information.
--
DDPOMail,
run by Raphael Geissert
More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
mailing list