[DRE-maint] RFS libsinatra-ruby_0.9.3-1 or sinatra_0.9.3-1

[Laurent Vallar]

Hi,

On Wed,Jul,22,2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On Mon,Jul,20,2009, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > If a lib is called libfoo-ruby, one always has to wonder whether the
> > > source package is libfoo-ruby, foo-ruby, ruby-foo, rfoo, foo4r, etc. 
> > > I know one can do some queries to find out the source package, but as
> > > packager I'd like the consisting naming.
> > > 
> > > Why do I bring this up now?  Well, because it's easy to rename
> > > source packages before the first upload.  Let me know if anyone
> > > disagrees with the old convention, I'm sure we can work it out.
> > > [...]
> > 
> > You're right, the first try was a package called 'sinatra'. But after
> > reading latest Candidate new Ruby policy (v2) from Lucas, i changed the
> > target names.
> > 
> > cf. http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2009/04/msg00023.html
> 
> I think that what Paul means is that he would prefer the source package
> name to be libsinatra-ruby, not just sinatra.
> 
> I don't have a preference for one or the other solution.
> 

Ok, it was about the source package name.

To change the source package name i have to change 'sinatra' to
'libsinatra-ruby' in debian/control and debian/changelog files.

Do i have to change SVN directory name too (i.e. doing a 'svn move
sinatra libsinatra-ruby' in packages-wip directory) ?

Regards.

-- 
 .''`.
: :' : Laurent Vallar - aka Val - Network & System Staff Engineer
`. `'  GPG Key: 1024D/C4F38417 - http://www.zbla.net
  `-