[DRE-maint] Bug#495320: Isn't this fixed

Chanoch (Ken) Bloom kbloom at gmail.com
Thu May 21 14:28:13 UTC 2009


I see this is tagged wontfix. Isn't this actually fixed by
libgems-ruby/1.3.2-1 which includes a rubygems package without any
maintainer scripts to do the purging? (So upgrading from old rubygems
to rubygems 1.3.2-1 will change the destructive postrm to a no-op
postrm, which will transfer ownership of the gems to rubygems1.8? (So
any future package renames that create a transition package should
also have the same semantics for change of ownership.)

-- 
Chanoch (Ken) Bloom. PhD candidate. Linguistic Cognition Laboratory.
Department of Computer Science. Illinois Institute of Technology.
http://www.iit.edu/~kbloom1/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20090521/9ff989d3/attachment-0001.pgp>


More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list