[DRE-maint] rails pkg

Ondřej Surý ondrej at sury.org
Mon Jul 22 09:25:27 UTC 2013


Now when rails-4.0 hit sid, I would like to resume the talk on what to do
with rails in Debian.

I propose to be much more aggressive and keep only the latest/greatest
upstream version, even if that means leaving some packages behind and not
released (we can always use backports, etc.).

The state when we have released rails-2.3 in wheezy is very sad, and it
should not have happened. It would be better to have wheezy without redmine
(etc.) than to have rails-2.3 in wheezy.

The opposing view would be that rails is more similar to ruby itself and we
have multiple ruby-1.8 / ruby-1.9.1 / ruby-2.0 / ... in the archive.

Opinions?

Ondrej


On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Ondřej Surý <ondrej at sury.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> what's your opinion on rails(-defaults) pkg?
>
> Should we bump it to 3.2 or just remove it and keep only rails3?
>
> (And what to do when rails-4.0 is out?)
>
> O.
> --
> Ondřej Surý <ondrej at sury.org>
>



-- 
Ondřej Surý <ondrej at sury.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20130722/ebc5d699/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list