[DRE-maint] Bug#737200: ruby-rmagick: 2 examples for the documentation fail (only) on i386 during build

Cédric Boutillier boutil at debian.org
Fri Jan 31 10:06:30 UTC 2014


Package: ruby-rmagick
Version: 2.13.2-2
Severity: normal

The problem reported in http://bugs.debian.org/733723
is still present. On i386, two examples run to build the doc by the
post-setub.rb script, namely doc/ex/shadow.rb and
doc/ex/stroke_linecap.rb fail with an error looking like:

> /usr/bin/ruby1.9.1 -I /«PKGBUILDDIR»/./lib -I /«PKGBUILDDIR»/./ext/RMagick stroke_linecap.rb (example 156 of 188)
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/lib/RMagick.rb:1836: warning: assigned but unused variable - current
> stroke_linecap.rb:42:in `draw': pixels are not authentic `' @ error/cache.c/QueueAuthenticPixelCacheNexus/4387 (Magick::ImageMagickError)
>                        from stroke_linecap.rb:42:in `<main>'

Those result in three missing image examples in ruby-rmagick-doc when
built on i386 (shadow_before.gif, shadow_after.gif, stroke_linecap.gif).
However, running those examples directly from the command line do not
generate any errors and the corresponding images are created.

It is a mysterious bug, probably in imagemagick itself.

Cédric


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (150, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages ruby-rmagick depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.17-97
ii  libmagickcore5                8:6.7.7.10-7
ii  libruby1.9.1                  1.9.3.484-1
ii  libruby2.0                    2.0.0.353-1
ii  rubinius [ruby-interpreter]   2.0.0+gitb2952297-1
ii  ruby                          1:1.9.3
ii  ruby1.9.1 [ruby-interpreter]  1.9.3.484-1
ii  ruby2.0 [ruby-interpreter]    2.0.0.353-1

ruby-rmagick recommends no packages.

ruby-rmagick suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list