[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-cleanroom_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes

[Hleb Valoshka]

On 6/22/15, Thorsten Alteholz <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
> I marked your package for accept, but why did you do that lintian override?

zeha@ asked to fix the lintian warning "new-package-should-close-itp-bug".


> As you didn't close an ITP bug, the lintian warning is rather correct.

Okay, I will not override this warning for other packages w/o ITP
(except for ruby-retryable, it's already in NEW).