[DRE-maint] Bug#591419: Same librmagick problem again

Antonio Terceiro terceiro at debian.org
Fri Dec 2 13:37:39 UTC 2016


On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:03:46AM -0800, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> >  * the second one is that librmagick-ruby is very easily broken by
> > newer versions of imagemagick, which is actually very hard to track.
> > This will need some thinking; possibly a solution would be a strict
> > versioned dependency along if only binNMUs for each imagemagick
> > release ?
> 
> What happened to this idea? I think this is the (a?) reason ruby-rmagick
> is currently failing its autopkgtests, using an imagemagick at runtime
> that it is not built against?
> 
> We have seen this on Ubuntu as well, and I wonder if it would be
> appropriate to just extract the libmagickcore version used at build-time
> and override the shlib-depends for that package with specifically the
> built-using version? Thanks to Adam Conrad for this suggestion.
> 
> I can work on a patch, if it would be acceptable.

patches are *always* welcome
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20161202/df160818/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list