[DRE-maint] Bug#816254: marked as done (ruby-packetfu: FTBFS: expected NameError with "uninitialized constant PacketFu::FakePacket", got #<NameError: uninitialized constant PacketFu::FakePacket)

Mon Feb 29 21:39:30 UTC 2016

Your message dated Mon, 29 Feb 2016 21:37:27 +0000
with message-id <E1aaVVP-0003Mm-31 at franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#816254: fixed in ruby-packetfu 1.1.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #816254,
regarding ruby-packetfu: FTBFS: expected NameError with "uninitialized constant PacketFu::FakePacket", got #<NameError: uninitialized constant PacketFu::FakePacket
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
816254: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816254
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Chris Lamb <lamby at debian.org>
Subject: ruby-packetfu: FTBFS: expected NameError with "uninitialized constant PacketFu::FakePacket", got #<NameError: uninitialized constant PacketFu::FakePacket
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 08:11:14 +0000
Size: 7687
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20160229/f24757bb/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro.duarte at gmail.com>
Subject: Bug#816254: fixed in ruby-packetfu 1.1.11-2
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 21:37:27 +0000
Size: 5231
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20160229/f24757bb/attachment-0001.mht>