[DRE-maint] Bug#832222: foodcritic: Section should not be “ruby”

[Ben Finney]

On 25-Jul-2016, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Ben (2016.07.23_05:17:01_-0700)
> > The package ‘foodcritic’ installs primarily an application, of
> > interest regardless of the programming language. It should not be in
> > the “ruby” section.
> 
> foodcritic is a linter for chef cookbooks, which are written in ruby.
> Well, chef cookbooks are a ruby-based DSL, but it's essentially ruby.

The Section for a package is meant to guide people in finding
packages.

Someone looking for Chef tools is less likely to be looking in the Ruby
language section, and more likely to be looking in the system
administration section. Would you agree?

-- 
 \     “I wrote a song, but I can't read music so I don't know what it |
  `\    is. Every once in a while I'll be listening to the radio and I |
_o__)        say, ‘I think I might have written that.’” —Steven Wright |
Ben Finney <ben at benfinney.id.au>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20160726/56a29d80/attachment-0001.sig>