[DRE-maint] Bug#816842: marked as done (ruby-buff-extensions: FTBFS: Failure/Error: expect(hash.dig('ssl.verify')).to eql(false))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 6 Mar 2016 10:26:49 -0300
with message-id <20160306132648.GB85368 at sx>
and subject line Re: #816842: fixed in unstable already
has caused the Debian Bug report #816842,
regarding ruby-buff-extensions: FTBFS: Failure/Error: expect(hash.dig('ssl.verify')).to eql(false)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
816842: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816842
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Chris Lamb <lamby at debian.org>
Subject: ruby-buff-extensions: FTBFS: Failure/Error: expect(hash.dig('ssl.verify')).to eql(false)
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 17:01:25 +0000
Size: 9278
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20160306/e6043e9d/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Christian Hofstaedtler <zeha at debian.org>
Subject: Re: #816842: fixed in unstable already
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 10:26:49 -0300
Size: 1535
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20160306/e6043e9d/attachment-0001.mht>