[DRE-maint] Bug#819079: marked as done (ruby-powerpack ships without a gemspec file)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner at bugs.debian.org
Sun May 1 22:30:20 UTC 2016


Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2016 22:27:44 +0000
with message-id <E1awzq4-0005Tv-FB at franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#819079: fixed in ruby-powerpack 0.1.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #819079,
regarding ruby-powerpack ships without a gemspec file
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
819079: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819079
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Matthias Klose <doko at debian.org>
Subject: ruby-powerpack ships without a gemspec file
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:47:11 +0100
Size: 2020
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20160501/b9162fda/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Sebastien Badia <seb at sebian.fr>
Subject: Bug#819079: fixed in ruby-powerpack 0.1.1-3
Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 22:27:44 +0000
Size: 4936
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20160501/b9162fda/attachment-0001.mht>


More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list