[DRE-maint] Bug#881627: Congratulations AmazonShopper! fVhLRz

mannywellz2005 at gmail.com mannywellz2005 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 14 21:51:31 UTC 2017


Bye


> On Nov 13, 2017, at 12:30 PM, AmazonReward Alert <debian.axhn at manchmal.in-ulm.de> wrote:
> 
> Message for emanuel
> 
> 
> 
>    
> 
>   
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Source: ruby-http-parser.rb Version: 0.6.0-3+b3 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Dear Maintainer, your package build-depends on http-parser, and a new version of that one has been around for a while. Even before eventually uploading last night I already saw a problem in the test suite of your package. However, due to a fault on my side, the new http-parser went to unstable instead of experimental. So this increases the pressure for your package, sorry about that. With http-parser 2.7.1, one test fails: 1) HTTP::Parser should parse request: line folding in header value Failure/Error: expect(@headers).to eq(test) expected: {"Line1"=3D>"abcdefghijklmno qrs", "Line2"=3D>"line2\t"} got: {"Line1"=3D>"abc\tdef ghi\t\tjkl mno \t \tqrs", "Line2"= =3D>"line2\t"} (compared using =3D=3D) Diff: @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -"Line1" =3D> "abcdefghijklmno qrs", +"Line1" =3D> "abc\tdef ghi\t\tjkl mno \t \tqrs", "Line2" =3D> "line2\t", # ./spec/parser_spec.rb:347:in `block (4 levels) in ' If I understand correctly, this is taken from spec/support/requests.json line 445 and 457f. While doubtlessly http-parser changed the behaviour, I'm not sure yet whether this wasn't rather about fixing bugs - bugs the test in ruby-http-parser.rb relied upon. However, HTTP header line folding is complicated and actually also deprecated in RFC 7230. Reading that one and also the older description in RFC 2616 I guess there a too many freedoms to expect a certain result. Also it seems http-parser 2.7.1 does unfolding in a ... surprising manner. Now, quite frankly, my main interest is a sound solution. Otherwise, I'm not keen on legal discussions, especially when it's about a deprecated feature like this one. It's my job to sort these things out with http-parser upstream but since I'm not sure how long this will take: Would you mind disabling or relaxing the test on your side for the time being? You might as well upgrade the test to the one in http-parser/test.c=C2=B9 which is where obviously it was taken from in the first place - but I'd expect this to change again soon. Sorry for the mess, and kind regards, Christoph =C2=B9 https://github.com/nodejs/http-parser/blob/master/test.c (line 614)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20171114/3f567f0b/attachment.html>


More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list