[DRE-maint] Bug#976945: ruby-awesome-print: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: Failure/Error: expect(my.ai(plain: true)).to eq("#{my.inspect}\n" << `ls -alF #{my.path}`.chop) 

[Lucas Nussbaum]

Source: ruby-awesome-print
Version: 1.8.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on ppc64el. At the same time, it did not fail on amd64.

I'm marking this bug as severity:serious since your package has only
Architecture:all binary packages, and should thus, in theory, build
everywhere. Failure to build on ppc64el might indicate a serious issue
in this package or in another package.

But feel free to downgrade or close if you believe that this is only a
build-time issue. (I would personnally prefer a severity:minor bug just to
track that the package can only be built on specific architectures.)

Relevant part (hopefully):
>      Failure/Error: expect(my.ai(plain: true)).to eq("#{my.inspect}\n" << `ls -alF #{my.path}`.chop)
>      
>        expected: "#<My:/tmp>\ntotal 298732\ndrwxrwxrwt 199 root   root       57344 Dec  8 23:45 ./\ndrwxr-xr-x  22 roo...11 Dec  8 23:17 trim.bam\n-rw-r--r--   1 root   root   299675753 Dec  8 14:21 unstable-amd64.tar.gz"
>             got: "#<My:/tmp>\ntotal 298732\ndrwxrwxrwt 199 root   root       57344 Dec  8 23:45 ./\ndrwxr-xr-x  22 roo...11 Dec  8 23:17 trim.bam\n-rw-r--r--   1 root   root   299675753 Dec  8 14:21 unstable-amd64.tar.gz"
>      
>        (compared using ==)
>      
>        Diff:
>        @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
>         -rw-------   1 root   root         214 Dec  8 23:44 ruby-awesome-print20201209-29209-enj8dp
>         -rw-r--r--   1 root   root       85106 Dec  8 23:45 ruby-awesome-print_1.8.0-2_unstable.log
>         -rw-------   1 root   root         216 Dec  8 23:44 ruby-sys-filesystem20201209-29209-1ce3gos
>        --rw-r--r--   1 root   root       31668 Dec  8 23:45 ruby-sys-filesystem_1.1.7-2_unstable.log
>        +-rw-r--r--   1 root   root       31474 Dec  8 23:45 ruby-sys-filesystem_1.1.7-2_unstable.log
>         drwx------   2 user42 user42      4096 Dec  8 22:02 runtime-user42/
>         -rw-r--r--   1 user42 user42     12288 Dec  8 23:14 sdk_fcp.sqlite
>         -rw-r--r--   1 user42 user42     16384 Dec  8 23:14 sdk_guest.sqlite
>        
>      # ./spec/formats_spec.rb:705:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
> 
> Finished in 0.41087 seconds (files took 0.58209 seconds to load)
> 202 examples, 1 failure, 55 pending
> 
> Failed examples:
> 
> rspec ./spec/formats_spec.rb:700 # AwesomePrint Inherited from standard Ruby classes inherited from Dir should be displayed as Dir
> 
> /usr/bin/ruby2.7 -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.9.3/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.9.2/lib /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.9.2/exe/rspec --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb failed
> ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: 

Apparently the test suite looks at the content of /tmp, and fails if it
changes while the test suite is running.

The full build log is available from:
   http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/12/09/ruby-awesome-print_1.8.0-2_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with me
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on a Power8 cluster part of the
Grid'5000 testbed. Hardware specs: https://www.grid5000.fr/w/Grenoble:Hardware#drac