[DRE-maint] ruby-pg-query_1.3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Sean Whitton spwhitton at spwhitton.name
Mon Apr 5 01:03:20 BST 2021


Hello Pirate,

On Mon 29 Mar 2021 at 11:50PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:

>>> +----------------------+
>>> |    Other comments    |
>>> +----------------------+
>>>
>>> A huge amount of uncompiled source code is installed into /usr/lib;
>>> shouldn't it be in /usr/share, and installed arch:all?
>>
>> These are used during build. Its upstream build system downloads
>> these sources during build. I have patched its build system to use
>> the sources provided as extra tarball. I had to include these files
>> in list of files in gemspec for the build to find these files. I will
>> need help from ruby team to exclude these in the binary package.
>>
>> At least right now, the default is to include all files belonging to
>> a gem in a single directory, either arch specific directory or arch
>> independent directory. I don't think we can mix directories for same
>> gem.
>>
>> Ruby team, any ideas on the best method here? If we don't add it to
>> gemspec's list of files, it won't build and if we remove the files in
>> deb, we will have a broken gemspec file.
>>
>
> Can you accept the package and file a bug with appropriate severity so
> we can tackle this later? We could not yet find a good way to solve
> this and I don't think it is worthy of a reject.

Changing arch:any->arch:all is not an ordinary change and might require
going through NEW again, so I don't think this should be accepted in its
current state.

-- 
Sean Whitton
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 869 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20210405/5c19ba98/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list