[DRE-maint] Bug#1011676: ruby-ntlm: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Failure/Error: OpenSSL::Digest::MD4.digest pwd

[Lucas Nussbaum]

Source: ruby-ntlm
Version: 0.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lucas at debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
>       Failure/Error: OpenSSL::Digest::MD4.digest pwd
> 
>       OpenSSL::Digest::DigestError:
>         Digest initialization failed: initialization error
>       # ./lib/net/ntlm.rb:149:in `ntlm_hash'
>       # ./spec/lib/net/ntlm_spec.rb:119:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
> 
> Finished in 0.29403 seconds (files took 0.31806 seconds to load)
> 741 examples, 19 failures
> 
> Failed examples:
> 
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm/client/session_spec.rb:14 # Net::NTLM::Client::Session#sign_message signs a message and when KEY_EXCHANGE is true
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm/client/session_spec.rb:27 # Net::NTLM::Client::Session#verify_signature verifies a message signature
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm/client/session_spec.rb:39 # Net::NTLM::Client::Session#seal_message should seal the message
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm/client/session_spec.rb:47 # Net::NTLM::Client::Session#unseal_message should unseal the message
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm/client/session_spec.rb:55 # Net::NTLM::Client::Session#exported_session_key returns a random 16-byte key when negotiate_key_exchange? is true
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm/message/type2_spec.rb:64 # Net::NTLM::Message::Type2 should generate a type 3 response
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm/message/type2_spec.rb:81 # Net::NTLM::Message::Type2 should upcase domain when provided
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm/message/type3_spec.rb:97 # Net::NTLM::Message::Type3.parse with NTLMv2 data #blank_password? should be true
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm/message/type3_spec.rb:154 # Net::NTLM::Message::Type3.parse NTLM2 Session Response Authentication; NTLM2 Signing and Sealing Using the 128-bit NTLM2 Session Response User Session Key With Key Exchange Negotiated #password? should be true for "test1234"
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm/message/type3_spec.rb:159 # Net::NTLM::Message::Type3.parse NTLM2 Session Response Authentication; NTLM2 Signing and Sealing Using the 128-bit NTLM2 Session Response User Session Key With Key Exchange Negotiated #blank_password? should be false
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm_spec.rb:36 # Net::NTLM should encrypt the string with DES for each key supplied
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm_spec.rb:42 # Net::NTLM should generate an lm_hash
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm_spec.rb:46 # Net::NTLM should generate an ntlm_hash
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm_spec.rb:50 # Net::NTLM should generate an ntlmv2_hash
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm_spec.rb:62 # Net::NTLM should generate an lm_response
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm_spec.rb:71 # Net::NTLM should generate an ntlm_response
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm_spec.rb:81 # Net::NTLM should generate a lvm2_response
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm_spec.rb:91 # Net::NTLM should generate a ntlmv2_response
> rspec ./spec/lib/net/ntlm_spec.rb:116 # Net::NTLM should generate a ntlm2_session
> 
> /usr/bin/ruby3.0 -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.10.3/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.10.1/lib /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.10.1/exe/rspec --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*.rb --format documentation failed
> ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: 


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/05/25/ruby-ntlm_0.6.3-1_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20220525;users=lucas@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20220525&fusertaguser=lucas@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.