[DRE-maint] Bug#1031052: puma: flaky autopkgtest: It fails randomly.
Aurelien Jarno
aurel32 at debian.org
Sun Jul 9 11:00:47 BST 2023
Dear maintainers,
On 2023-02-11 00:00, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Source: puma
> Version: 5.6.5-2
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ci at lists.debian.org
> User: debian-ci at lists.debian.org
> Usertags: flaky
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails from time to
> time.
> From
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/puma/testing/amd64/
>
> openssl/3.0.8-1 failed
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/puma/31159611/log.gz
> openssl/3.0.8-1 passed
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/puma/31166222/log.gz
>
> s390x, failed:
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/p/puma/31163926/log.gz
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/p/puma/31207049/log.gz
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/p/puma/31207176/log.gz
>
> then passed
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/p/puma/31207506/log.gz
>
> My understanding is that the error is a different in the three failures
> on s390x.
>
> Could you please have a look?
As additional data points, it fails evens for the migration reference
run very close in time, so with the exact same set of packages:
success:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/puma/35598630/log.gz
failure:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/puma/35598629/log.gz
Could you please have a look? It's annoying for other maintainers to get
their package blocked by this one.
Regards
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien at aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
mailing list