[DRE-maint] Bug#1088648: vips: update to 8.16.0 causes regression in ruby-vips autopkgtest

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

On 30/11/2024 20:56, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
> 
> On 30/11/2024 05:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 29/11/2024 20:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Control: reassign -1 ruby-vips
>>> Control: affects -1 vips
>>> Control: tags -1 patch
>>>
>>> (actually reassigning)
>>>
>>> On 29/11/2024 18:48, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>>>> reassign -1 ruby-vips
>>>> affects -1 vips
>>>>
>>>> Hi Emilio,
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:51 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
>>>> <pochu at debian.org> wrote:
>>>>> Your package cannot migrate to testing due to a regression in ruby-vips'
>>>>> autopkgtest:
>>>>   Indeed it is fired by the Vips 8.16.0 release, but the source of it
>>>> lies in ruby-vips. Already reported upstream and got a fix. The actual
>>>> patch is this [1].
>>>
>>> Nice.
>>>
>>>> Unfortunately it seems this package is not
>>>> maintained, at least the last upload was two years ago. Meanwhile
>>>> three upstream releases were tagged, including a somewhat big (v2.2.0)
>>>> one.
>>>
>>> ruby-vips maintainers, can we get a fix for this? It's blocking the 
>>> imagemagick transition, which is blocking the php one. I'll probably upload 
>>> the fix to DELAYED/2, but let me know if I should delay it longer or upload 
>>> without delay, or if you can just push the fix then all the better.
>>>
>>> fwiw I'd prefer a minimal fix and not an update to 2.2.2, that can happen 
>>> after this fix is in testing though.
>>
>> I have uploaded the minimal fix pointed by László to DELAYED/2, and submitted 
>> it as a MR on salsa. Let me know if I can reschedule it, in order to finish 
>> the imagemagick transition.
> 
> Thanks for the patch! I reviewed the MR on salsa and it looks good, I just 
> merged it. Feel free to upload it without any delay.

Thanks! I'm rescheduling it.

Cheers,
Emilio