[DRE-maint] Bug#1103848: ruby-rails-propshaft: package name should be ruby-propshaft

[Pirate Praveen]

On 23/04/2025 1:49 pm, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> The thought process with the name is that this package is only useful
> to rails.  It can’t be used generally by other Ruby packages.
>
> Upstream is propshaft inside of the rails project.

Only golang follows that convention because you have to also import by 
full url. But every rubygem the name is unique and every other ruby gem 
package only adds ruby- to gem name. Only when there is fork and two 
different gems by close enough gems we add the repo name.

This is already established naming standard used for all rubygems as 
codified in gem2deb.

> https://github.com/rails/propshaft
>
> However, if there is a general consensus that this should be named
> ruby-propshaft I am not opposed to changing it.
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0x8F53E0193B294B75.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 4938 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP public key
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20250423/a23b7949/attachment-0001.asc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20250423/a23b7949/attachment-0001.sig>