[DRE-maint] Bug#1078640: puma: will FTBFS during trixie support period

[Timo Röhling]

Hi,

as an alternative proposal, the attached patch fixes the bug by 
re-generating the example certificates before the test.

Cheers
Timo

On Wed, 28 May 2025 14:49:16 +0200 Santiago Vila <sanvila at debian.org> 
wrote:
> tags 1078640 patch
> thanks
> 
> Hello. The attached trivial patch (to be imported with quilt) should fix this bug.
> 
> Thanks.
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀   ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   │ Timo Röhling                                       │
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1  23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀   ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: puma.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 3071 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20250716/cbbe4c2b/attachment.patch>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20250716/cbbe4c2b/attachment.sig>