[DRE-maint] Bug#1078640: puma: will FTBFS during trixie support period

[Timo Röhling]

Hi,

* Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro at riseup.net> [2025-07-17 02:13]:
>I am not sure if we want to add Java runtime as dependency here. I 
>discussed that with Athos Ribeiro and he has a patch just updating the 
>certificates for the period of 5 years (to also cover LTS). This is not 
>the best solution since we will need to renew them every freeze, but it 
>is the best we can get without adding more dependencies.

I have no strong feelings one way or the other. I think it would be best 
to (re-)generate certificates at build time to avoid spurious failures 
when the certificates expire, and I wanted to have the RC bugfix for 
trixie. I marked the additional dependencies with <!nocheck> so it is 
clear they are not actually required for the package build itself. 
Ultimately, I am happy to leave this design decision up to you as the 
maintainer.


Cheers
Timo

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀   ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   │ Timo Röhling                                       │
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1  23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀   ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20250718/a4481767/attachment.sig>