[Pkg-rust-maintainers] rust-os-pipe_0.6.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

[Ximin Luo]

Chris Lamb:
> Hi,
> 
>> Not that we mind, on contraire but we are wondering why you accept 
>> quickly the new packages and not the 25 in new for (just a bit) longer :)
> 
> I've found it more useful to prioritise newer packages during DebConf
> and DebCamp as — all things being equal — they can be blocking further
> testing or hacking. Naturally, this is not always the case.
> 

Hey Chris & other FTP masters,

For the rust packages we are uploading them in roughly build-dependency order, so processing the older ones with higher priority would be appreciated too. I haven't actually uploaded any yet at DebConf but the next stuff I have my eyes on does depend on stuff already in the NEW queue that we uploaded *before* DebConf.

X

-- 
GPG: ed25519/56034877E1F87C35
GPG: rsa4096/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE
https://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git