[Pkg-rust-maintainers] rust-jemallocator_0.3.2-1_amd64.changes is NEW

kpcyrd kpcyrd at rxv.cc
Thu Jun 11 16:03:14 BST 2020

On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 12:05:23PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Sylvestre,
> On Sat 23 May 2020 at 07:51PM +02, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > Oh, OK. It would have been nice to have a clear communication on this.
> >
> > We had some discussions with some ftpmasters but it wasn't clear to me
> > it became a policy.
> > Do you have a recommendation of the number of binary packages or long
> > Provides
> > (or know what will be accepted or not?)
> I wouldn't say it's a policy.  It's just that team members don't want to
> do things which would ignore the concerns of other team members, or they
> share those concerns directly (I don't know enough to have an opinion on
> it so I'm in the former group).
> > Piece of advice: please reject packages instead of leaving them pending
> > for 6+ months :)
> We consider REJECT a serious button to press and don't do it unless we
> know for sure the package can't enter the archive.  In this case, the
> discussion is unresolved, so we don't know, so we don't press it.


I'm currently stuck in a situation in which I can't address bugs in
packages due to dependencies being stuck in NEW.

Are there any options forward for somebody who doesn't work on the
tooling, besides pausing maintainership?


> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-rust-maintainers mailing list
> Pkg-rust-maintainers at alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-rust-maintainers

More information about the Pkg-rust-maintainers mailing list