[Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1013273: linking problems on ppc64el

Arnaud Ferraris arnaud.ferraris at collabora.com
Wed Aug 3 23:43:00 BST 2022


Hi,

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:56:43 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?RnLDqWTDqXJpYw==?= Bonnard 
<frederic at fr.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Sylvestre,
> at first, I thought it may be a squeekboard coding issue too, but the fact that the
> same code breaks with rustc 1.59 and not 1.58 made me think of a
> regression (be it squeekboard 1.17.1 or 1.18.0). Also, only rust
> components where changed for this test : exact same gcc etc ..
> If rustc changed it's behaviour in between, at least the compiler would
> have given an advice or a tip. Anyway this does not occur on other
> architectures, so yes, I rather think it may be some thorny ppc64el
> regression on rustc side, but that is only an assumption.
> I'm no rust expert to maybe try a different layout of the code or maybe
> rust link option that could help and workaround that linking issue for
> the time being.
> 
> F.

I'm one of the maintainers of squeekboard, and can confirm this is 
likely a regression in rustc 1.59.0 as I could successfully build with 
1.58.1 as well (using a ppc64el docker container).

The issue happens when building a small binary (squeekboard-test-layout) 
which uses only a small subset of the functions provided by the whole 
rust library. However, it seems that on ppc64el the compiler tries to 
resolve all symbols from the library, even those which aren't actually 
used by the binary.

It seems to only affect 1.59.0 though, as rustc >= 1.60.0 (installed 
from rustup) doesn't exhibit the same behavior, so I assume we'll be 
able to close this bug once a new enough version hits Debian.

Regards,
Arnaud



More information about the Pkg-rust-maintainers mailing list