[Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1013920: Bug#1013920: rust-all: Debian violating Rust Trademark (as serious a situation as "iceweasel")

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Thanks for bringing it to our attention, I have consulted with the Rust 
foundation, we have agreed a change, we think this change solves it.

See 
https://foundation.rust-lang.org/policies/logo-policy-and-media-guide/ 
for the updated policy.

Cheers,
Sylvestre

Le 27/06/2022 à 13:52, lkcl a écrit :
> Package: rust-all
> Severity: serious
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: Policy 2.1
>
> https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/rust-s-freedom-flaws/11533
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2021/05/msg00006.html
> https://foundation.rust-lang.org/policies/logo-policy-and-media-guide/
>
> this is an extremely serious situation that exposes debian to a greater
> level of risk that was undergone for the last Mozilla-Foundation
> Trademark fiasco, iceweasel
>
> Rust's Trademark requirements are that "you must seek our explicit
> permission before distributing patches".
>
>      Uses that require explicit approval
>
>      Distributing a **MODIFIED VERSION** of the Rust programming language
>      or the Cargo package manager and calling it Rust or Cargo requires
>      explicit, written permission from the Rust core team.
>
> there are dozens of such patches and every single one of them, unless
> explicit permission has been sought, is a DIRECT Trademark violation
>
>      https://sources.debian.org/patches/rustc/1.36.0+dfsg1-2/
>
> the over-ride of the Trademark on "Free" software is Lawful and
> in this case makes rust (and cargo) non-free software.
>
> unlike the Iceweasel debacle, the linux kernel is upstream merging
> rust, potentially making the entire linux kernel critically dependent
> on a non-free compiler.
>
> there is the additional issue that although Debian might seek and
> be granted explicit permission for a Trademark License Grant to
> Distribute, that does not cover Derivatives, which would also
> need to explicitly seek their own permission
>
>      https://www.debian.org/derivatives/
>      https://devuan.org
>
> this has been discussed that DFSG Guideline 8 is violated by even
> attempting to seek a License specific to Debian
>
>      https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-legal@lists.debian.org/msg45464.html
>
> this is an extremely serious situation that either requires pulling
> rust and cargo from debian or a rename of both rust and cargo exactly
> as was done with iceweasel.
>
> failure to do so is also extremely serious because Unlawful Distribution
> may still be considered grounds for financial compensation as well as
> a Legal Notice to Cease and Desist, and also to remove all public and private
> use of the Trademark from all Records.  mailing lists, bugtracker,
> debian archives - everything.
>
> this one cannot be ignored.
>
>
> -- System Information:
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-rust-maintainers mailing list
> Pkg-rust-maintainers at alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-rust-maintainers