[Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#986357: Please improve package description

[Guillem Jover]

Hi!

On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 03:58:34 +0000, peter green wrote:
> As far as the current description goes, I think it's generally not
> too bad but I think there are some minor improvements that could be
> made.

[…]
> * I feel it lacks a bit in "big picture", I *think* sqv is the main
>   command line tool for the sequoia project. If that is the case
>   it would be nice to say so expliciltly and upfront.

The main CLI is sq. The sqv CLI is intended to be the equivalent
of gpgv, as in a verification only tool, where the full blown thing is
not necessary.

>   Also since
>   people will be comparing it with gpg it might be an idea to point
>   out explicitly whether things like web of trust support are
>   included.

AFAIK there's a separate sq-wot tool for this. Other related
projects include sq-keyring-linter and sqop, or even the GnuPG
Chameleon, or openpgp-cert-d among others.

> * I'm not sure a list of subcommands belongs in a package
>   description or if the description would be better sticking
>   to describing functionality.

Given that the CLI is still in flux, I guess for now it might be
helpful, but perhaps a more descriptive one might be better, dunno.

Thanks,
Guillem