[Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1077511: please compare against dfrs in long description

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Package: dysk
Version: 2.9.0-2
Severity: normal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I have difficulty understanding the purpose of this package.
I do understand what is described in the long description, but what I am
missing is how "df but better" is not already covered by the package
dfrs.

Since the purpose of the long description is to aid the user in deciding
suitability of installing the package, I recommend to improve the long
description to compare not only against df but also dfrs.

Personally I installed the package, tried it out and read its manpage,
but still failed to find any benefit of dysk over dfrs, and a few
drawbacks (expansion of device paths, lack of highlighting critically
filled partitions, and argually needless use of box drawing characters),
so I cannot help suggest what concretely might be the wording.

Kind regards,

 - Jonas

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=D8n5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----