[Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bootstrap of rust

[Jordan Justen]

On 2015-01-21 13:23:32, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> On 21/01/2015 21:59, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > On 2015-01-21 08:22:42, Luca Bruno wrote:
> >> I'd just retargeted it to experimental (so we don't have to fear if we make 
> >> major screwups),
> > I had been told by another DD that experimental doesn't really make
> > sense for 'new' packages. I was told it was useful for newer versions
> > of a package to make sure it did not break existing users of the
> > package.
> There are different interpretations.  With the freeze, new packages
> won't be migrating to testing. So, in this case, unstable would be
> fine but if Luca prefers to go with experimental, I am happy too.

I haven't enabled experimental on any of my systems, so I'd prefer
unstable. :)

I don't think we are likely to break anyone's system, since it is a
new package, and it shouldn't conflict with any other packages.

But, I'll leave the call to you guys.

-Jordan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-rust-maintainers/attachments/20150121/0aa9437c/attachment.sig>